Skip Navigation Links

Your browser may be very out of date -- consider upgrading!


Electron Microprobe Dating of Monazite at NMBGMR / NMT

Preliminary results of a workshop at NMT given by Michael J. Jercinovic (University of Massachusetts)

Method Overview:

Assumption:
No non-radiogenic lead in monazite or at least very little

If you can precisely measure U, Th, and Pb (in ppm), you can solve this equation iteratively for lead to obtain an age

Map thin section with the microprobe
Ce, Fe, Y to find all monazite crystals

Map monazite grains
Th, Y, U to see chemical domains

Measure major elements for matrix corrections

Spot analyses
Measure: U, Th, Pb, Y (to correct for peak interference with Pb--a minor correction)

Solve the age equation

Samples:

See an abstract of Williams et al., 1999 which describes the structural, metamorphic, and temporal setting for Proterozoic rocks in northern New Mexico and discusses the pervasive ~1.4 Ga metamorphic overprint of these rocks.

JB54: Tusas Mountains, Cerro Colorado near Ojo Caliente, NM. This sample is currently used at UMass to test analytical precision.

Our two spot microprobe ages of 1413±11 Ma and 1447±11 Ma are consistent with UMass results between 1.41 and 1.45 Ga (the grain average is 1.41 GA).

ARR96-114A & B: Rincon Range, Southern Sangre de Cristo Mountains just north of Mora, NM with an isotopic age of ~1.42 GA

This sample is a sillimanite nodule-quartz-muscovite schist. The outcrop it was taken from is part of a screen of supracrustal rocks intruded by the1.65 Ga Guadalupita pluton.

For further background information, see an abstract of Read et al., 1999 which summarizes the geologic setting of the monazites in this sample that have been dated isotopically at ~1421 Ma. It was hoped that the perhaps some remnant of Mazatzal metamorphism could be seen in these monazites from a sample thought to have experienced metamorphism both at ~1.65 GA and at ~1.42 Ga.

The probe data overall are consistent with the isotopic age, but with considerable variability (see the data spreadsheet, and the grain maps and images for details).

Data analysis:

(download a 650 Kb Excel file)

The probe data files have been organized into a spreadsheet (modeled on the spreadsheet that Mike supplied) that computes the ages. Several improvements have been made:

Images and element maps:

ARR96-114A

Section Maps (click for more detail)

Optical
Backscatter

Fe

Ce (labeled with monazite locations)

Grain Maps (tone curves have been adjusted, so don't compare intensities from grain to grain)

#
BSE + age (click for details)
Th
U
Y
1
3
4

 

ARR96-114B

Section Maps (click for more detail)

Optical
Backscatter
Fe

Ce (labeled with monazite locations)

Grain Maps

#
BSE + age (click for details)
Th
U
Y
1
4

Conclusions:

There are clearly age domains within the monazites analyzed from the Rincon Range that when averaged agree reasonably well with the isotopically derived age for these samples. However, we did not see any evidence for ~1.65 Ga monazite. This may be due to pervasive refabrication, fluid flux, and sufficiently high temperatures at ~1.4 Ga to recrystallize the monazite. Alternatively, this may imply that the inferred 1.65 Ga & 1.4 Ga polymetamorphism is not the correct interpretation. The oldest point analysis of 1527 Ma (sample ARR96-114A-grain 1, point 7) may be due to surface irregularity, a domain boundary, or some other analysis error. This may also be the case for the youngest age of 1251 Ma (same grain, point 22, very near the outer edge). Both the oldest and youngest points appear to be outliers and should probably be ignored in any case. The complex age domains, chemical zoning, and generally anhedral crystal morphology may collectively imply slow cooling at ~1.4 Ga and/or repeated magmatic-metamorphic pulses during the ~1.4 Ga tectonometamorphic event that in the Rincon Range may have lasted from perhaps 1460 Ma until 1380 Ma.

The best hope for finding older monazites in Proterozoic rocks from this and other ranges is likely to be within the cores of M1 garnets and other porphyroblasts. This will undoubtably be a very fruitful avenue of research for years to come.

Aknowledments:

All of the participants at the workshop very much appreciate the time and energy that Mike Jercinovic put into it. We look forward to utilizing and improving this exciting new technique!
Thanks Mike.

Some method references:

  1. Crowley, J.L., and Ghent, E.D. (1999) An electron microprobe study of the U-Th-Pb systematics of metamorphosed monazite: The role of Pb diffusion versus overgrowth and recrystallization. Chem. Geol. 157, 285-302.

  2. Montel, J.M., Kornprobst, J., and Vielzeuf, D. (2000) Preservation of old U-Th-Pb ages in shielded monazite: example from the Beni Bousera Hercynian kinzigites (Morocco). J. Metamorphic Geol. 18, 335-342.

  3. Suzuki, K., and Adachi, M. (1991) Precambrian provenance and Silurian metamorphism of the Tsunosawa paragneiss in the South Kitakami terrane, northeast Japan, revealed by the chemical Th-U-total Pb isochron ages of monazite, zircon and xenotime: Journal of Geochemistry 25, 357-376.

  4. Suzuki, K., and Adachi, M. (1998) Denudation history of the high T/P Ryoke metamorphic belt, southwest Japan: Constraints from CHIME monazite ages of gneisses and granitoids. J. Metamorphic Geol. 16, 23-37.

  5. Suzuki, K, Adachi, M., and Kajizuka, I. (1994) Electron microprobe observations of Pb diffusion in metamorphosed detrital monazites. Earth and Planet. Sci. Lett. 128, 391-405.

  6. Williams, M.L., Jercinovic, M.J., Terry, M.P., (1999) Age Mapping and dating of monazite on the electron microprobe: Deconvoluting multistage tectonic histories, Geology, v. 27, no. 11, p. 1023-1026.

Terms of Use | Accessibility

Revised: 27 June, 2012

© 2007 - 2008 NMBGMR
or as specified


Copyright © 2007 - 2008 New Mexico Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources unless otherwise specified.