Skip Navigation Links

Your browser may be very out of date -- consider upgrading!


GEOMETRY AND KINEMATICS OF RIFT FAULTS

Richard Chamberlin


The Rio Grande rift of central New Mexico is dominated by NNW- to NE-striking normal faults of Late Oligocene to Quaternary age. Crustal extension is distributed across many subparallel fault blocks. Fault traces commonly show abrupt changes in strike, often bifurcate, and occasionally step over to adjacent faults along transverse ramps (e.g. Chamberlin et.al, 1994a; Chamberlin and Harrison, 1996). Based on observations of striated fault surfaces most rift faults are apparently dip-slip to slightly oblique-slip normal faults. There is generally little or no evidence of significant strike slip faulting in areas of high-angle normal faulting. However, minor lateral slip may occur where a north or south propagating fault tip is deflected by a preexisting basement shear zone oriented at a high angle to the propagating rift fault (Chamberlin, 2000). Broad zones of lateral shear may be accommodated by a combination of minor vertical axis rotations and distributed oblique-slip normal faulting in which the dip-slip component is dominant.
Strong horizontal axis rotation and dip-slip separation of numerous subparallel fault blocks characterize a highly extended domain in the Socorro-Magdalena region. In late Oligocene time, closely spaced, originally high-angle normal faults and intervening blocks were progressively rotated like falling dominoes (Chamberlin, 1976,1978,1983). The process of domino-style extension was recorded in the Lemitar Mountains by wedge-shaped prisms of basaltic lavas that occur between westerly tilted ignimbrite sheets that range in age from 28.7 to 27.4 Ma. As much as 150% extensional strain in the Lemitar Mountains has caused originally high-angle down-to the-east domino faults to be rotated to horizontal orientations and locally to the geometry of east-vergent thrust faults (younger over older). Minor down-to-the-west antithetic normal faults have been rotated to the orientation of high-angle reverse faults and NE-striking transverse segments of corrugated fault traces now exhibit strike-slip striations and distinct lateral offsets. In domains of steeply dipping strata and sub-horizontal normal faults it seems appropriate to label these rotated structures as pseudo-thrust faults, pseudo-reverse faults and pseudo strike-slip faults, depending on their present geometry.

The ENE-trending Socorro accomodation zone (SAZ of Chapin, 1989; "transverse-shear zone" of Chapin, Chamberlin, Osburn and White, 1978) is a regional tilt-block domain boundary that separates west-tilted domino blocks on the north from east-tilted blocks on the south. Periodic magmatism along the SAZ has presumably allowed domino fault blocks to rotate in opposing directions but without the faults propagating laterally across the zone such that opposing faults would interlock at depth (i.e soft zones around intrusions permit highly distributed shear at depth). The SAZ has changed its character with evolving thermal regimes over the last 29 Ma. It has become shorter and more diffuse in late Miocene to Pliocene time (Chamberlin and Eggleston, 1996).
Northeast striking en echelon basins of Neogene age in the Reserve-Datil-Magdalena area (San Agustin arm of the rift) and a few observations of sub-horizontal striations on NE striking high-angle faults suggest a regional component of sinistral shear along southeastern margin of the Colorado Plateau (Chamberlin, 1993; Chamberlin et.al, 1994b). Westward migration of late Oligocene magmatism (Socorro-Magdalena caldera cluster), however, suggests a dextral component of shear may have occurred along the SE margin of the Colorado Plateau at this time.

Photo: Domino-style microfaults offset heavy mineral laminations in poorly indurated sands of the upper Santa Fe Group about 1 km east of the Grefco Perlite mine. Microfaults are associated with erosion and westward slumping in the footwall of the Socorro Canyon fault.

 

References:

Terms of Use | Accessibility

Revised: 27 June, 2012

© 2007 - 2008 NMBGMR
or as specified


Copyright © 2007 - 2008 New Mexico Bureau of Geology & Mineral Resources unless otherwise specified.