skip all navigation
skip banner links
skip primary navigation

Permian Reef Complex Virtual Field Trip
Stop I-4: Pisolite Facies at Top of Yates Fm.

Geographic location and stratigraphic 
 position of this stop.
Geographic location and stratigraphic position of this stop.

Outstanding exposures of pisolitic dolomites of the upper Yates Fm. (see Pray and Esteban, 1977; Dunham, 1972; Esteban and Pray, 1977). This locality illustrates numerous cycles of pisolitic, tepee-bearing sediments (termed "Walnutite cycles" by Pray and Esteban, 1977; see diagram below). Tepee structures can be seen both in this outcrop and in the distant canyon wall to the north (see photo). The main small-scale features to be seen at this outcrop are the abundant pisoliths which range from B-B-size to golf ball-size. They have concentric laminations of thin carbonate coatings around nuclei of fractured pisoliths or, rarely, marine fossils (see photo). The pisoliths, which have been completely replaced by aphanocrystalline dolomite, occur in cyclic beds, commonly with reverse grading (see photo). In some (but not most) cases, pisoliths have intergrown or interlocking textures (see photo).

Stratigraphic section
Stratigraphic section of the uppermost Yates Formation at the Hairpin Bend pisolite locality in Walnut Canyon, Carlsbad Caverns National Park, Eddy Co., New Mexico. Modified from Pray and Esteban (1977).
Tepee structure in Tansill Formation
Tepee structure in Tansill Formation. Note the fact that if the upturned margins of the structure were returned to a horizontal position, they could not be accomodated on a flat bedding plane; this confirms the concept that these are expansion polygons. Light yellow layers are dolomitized pisolitic and fenestral sediment; darker, gray layers are zones of sheet spar (aragonitic cement crusts). Interstitial growth of aragonite (in marine or coastal spring settings) was the most likely cause of sediment expansion and buckling. Outcrop at southwest end of parking lot at Carlsbad Caverns visitor's center, Carlsbad Caverns National Park, Eddy Co., NM.
© Peter A. Scholle, 1999
Pisoid from the Yates Formation
Thin-section photomicrograph (cross-polarized light) of a pisoid from the Yates Formation. Note irregular, lumpy, partially concentric coatings; fracturing ("autobrecciation") of micritic- peloidal matrix; and evaporite plugging of remnant intergranular porosity. Sample is from 1708.1 ft depth in Gulf/Chevron PDB-04 well on Northwestern Shelf of Delaware basin, 30 km ENE of Carlsbad, Eddy Co., NM. Long axis of photo = 14.5 mm
© Peter A. Scholle, 1999
pisolitic dolomite
Typical lenticular deposit of pisolitic dolomite from the uppermost Yates Formation. Note reverse grading of coated grains. Pisoids have been attributed to algal growth, caliche formation, marine spray-zone precipitation, and seepage-spring development. Roadside outcrop at hairpin turn on New Mexico Highway 7 in Carlsbad Caverns National Park, Eddy Co., New Mexico. Coin is 2.4 cm in diameter.
© Peter A. Scholle, 1999
Pisolitic dolomite from the uppermost Yates Formation
Polished slab of pisolitic dolomite from the uppermost Yates Formation. Note reverse grading of grains, and "fitted fabric" in which grains have interlocked boundaries produced by compromise growth of outer coatings. Sample from roadside outcrop at "hairpin turn" on New Mexico Highway 7 in Carlsbad Caverns National Park, Eddy Co., NM.
© Peter A. Scholle, 1999

There is considerable evidence to show that these pisoliths had original aragonite composition, now replaced by dolomite (see photo). They are associated with sheet cracks —broad bands of displacive, fibrous carbonate, presumably also originally aragonite (Loucks and Folk, 1976) but now dolomite or calcite (see photo). These displacive crusts are related to the origin of the tepee structures of this area for the tepees are expansion polygons formed by a volume increase of the associated sediments. This was most likely accomplished by in situ, near surface, displacive growth of aragonite and (or) evaporite minerals.

marine-cemented pisolitic dolomite showing transition from pisoid to botryoidal cement crust
Thin-section photomicrograph (plane-polarized light) of a marine-cemented pisolitic dolomite showing transition from pisoid to botryoidal cement crust. Note that the extremely elongate rays of cement which extend from upper surface of pisoid show squared crystal terminations. This has been used as evidence for an originally aragonitic composition for the cement (Loucks and Folk, 1976). Sample from 1739.3 ft depth in Gulf/Chevron PDB-04 well on Northwestern Shelf of Delaware basin, 30 km ENE of Carlsbad, Eddy Co., NM. Long axis of photo = 16 mm
© Peter A. Scholle, 1999
Transition from growth of free pisoids to a botryoidal cement crust
Transition from growth of free pisoids to a botryoidal cement crust is seen in this outcrop photo- graph of the uppermost Yates Formation. Last stages of pisoid precipitation occurred on the upper growth surfaces which eventually merged to form a crust of originally aragonitic cement. Roadside outcrop at hairpin turn on New Mexico Highway 7 in Carlsbad Caverns National Park, Eddy Co, New Mexico. Long axis of photo = ca. 12-15 cm.
© Peter A. Scholle, 1999

The origin of pisoliths and tepee structures in these sediments has been the subject of numerous studies and considerable controversy. Extensive discussions of these problems have been presented by Dunham (1972), Esteban and Pray (1977), Pray and Esteban (1977), and Handford et al. (1984) and so will be only briefly outlined here.

Basically there are three hypotheses: 1) the "all wet" model which proposes that the pisoliths were formed by organic (algal) or inorganic coating of grains in a shallow-water shelf setting with each grain acting as a free, clastic particle; 2) the "caliche" hypothesis which suggests that pisoliths formed in situ as part of cyclic, reverse graded, caliche profiles which formed by alteration of carbonate sediment brought into the area by storms or other episodic processes; and 3) salina "seepage" model which proposes that ocean water seepage through permeable barriers into sub-sealevel salinas can produce tepees and pisoliths by evaporation and precipitation. Advocates of any of these models can point to modern analogs (mainly from Persian Gulf, Red Sea, or Australian areas) with scattered, small-scale accumulations of aragonitic pisoliths in marginal marine, hypersaline settings. Yet nowhere have we discovered an analog which comes close to modeling the breadth and abundance of pisoliths that one sees in the Permian.

The differences of interpretation of these deposits, although important from the point of view of fully understanding the rocks, are not of great significance to the explorationist. There can be little argument that this facies must have stood close to a paleotopographic high-point in Guadalupian time. The persistence of this facies in space and time (it is present in Grayburg, Queen, Seven Rivers, Yates, and Tansill rocks), its consistent geometry (an elongate facies, parallel to the reef trend), and its equally consistent juxtaposition between open marine (grainstones with a high faunal diversity) and restricted (hypersaline mudstones and evaporites) environments indicate that the pisolite facies must either itself have been a major hydrographic barrier or it must have formed just landward of such a barrier. Nowhere in the world today are evaporitic mudstones and open marine, faunally diverse sediments in such close proximity without having an intervening barrier. It seems likely that to act as such a barrier, at least a narrow strip of land would have had to be subaerially exposed (except for tidal channels). This scenario would favor either the caliche or salina seep interpretations. Further support for the salina model may come from isopach studies of the thin sandstone/siltstone beds which are interspersed with the tepee-pisolith beds. Candelaria (1989) showed that these beds did not thin over the pisolite facies but did thin rapidly over the marine grainstones which lay just seaward of the pisolite facies. Although such a relationship may be due to reworking of shelf-margin sands by transgressive seas, it may also indicate depositional thinning over a topographic high in that area.

At this time, then, it seems most likely that the facies just seaward of the pisolites formed an elongate, irregular ridge of low-relief islands, tidal flats, and dunes (Fig.12) which allowed marine water seepage into the back barrier lagoon. Such seepage zones saw massive precipitation of aragonite cements and formation of pisoliths and in the modern Lake McLeod and Yorke Peninsula examples (Handford et al., 1984; Lock and Burne, 1986; Logan, 1987)

Finally, it is possible that a combination of processes could have been involved in the formation of pisoliths. A number of different types of pisoliths can be seen in the Permian strata. These range from the small, irregularly coated grains seen at Stop III-2 (and which almost certainly formed in a marine setting) to the larger, smoother, and more extensively encrusted grains present at this locality. Thus, a number of different origins can be envisioned for the various pisolith types.

The tepee structures and sheet cracks found in association with pisolitic sediments can also be interpreted as either marine or nonmarine. Displacive aragonite crusts and tepees have been noted in submarine cemented areas within the Persian Gulf itself as well as in coastal caliches and sabkha surfaces of the surrounding, subaerially-exposed coastlines (Kendall, 1969; Shinn, 1969; Warren, 1983).

ROADLOG ENDS. Return down-canyon to main El Paso-Carlsbad highway (U.S. 62-180).

Return to the Walnut Canyon Roadlog or the El Paso-Carlsbad Roadlog